Vol. 49, Issue 4, 2021

This article is a response to the Kennedy & Volokh article published in Volume 49, Issue 1.

This Article proposes that an apportionment formula like the market share concept adopted by the California Supreme Court in Sindell be adopted in opioid litigation and possibly other mass torts.

This comment addresses the perplexing problem of why Americans seem hesitant towards nutrition regulation.

This comment analyzes marijuana residency requirements and their shaky constitutional footing.